violacea: (ryan's hands are fascinating)
violacea ([personal profile] violacea) wrote2008-06-06 11:56 pm
Entry tags:

the not-quite-gen poll

So, I had some mental debates about how to classify my big bang, which led me to some other thoughts, and now I'm curious about the reading habits of others! I'm thinking in bandom right now, obviously, but I'd be interested in comparing and contrasting other fandoms, too, so everyone who reads fanfic should feel free to answer! And point people in this direction, too, because I'd love to get a large-ish sample.

[Poll #1200897]

Thoughts? Questions? Did I phrase something really weird? Let me know!

[identity profile] joyfulfeather.livejournal.com 2008-06-07 05:37 am (UTC)(link)
In general, I try to make my headers as specific as possible. If there are background pairings, I'll mention those but specify that they are in the background. If it's a pairing but there's nothing overtly romantic and falls more as friendship!fic, I'll mark that. The way I see it, more information can't hurt. Gives the reader more to go on when deciding to click the link or not. I'm personally very picky about what fic I read, so I like having info like that. I'd rather not have a background pairing take me by surprise.

[identity profile] seimaisin.livejournal.com 2008-06-09 03:13 am (UTC)(link)
I understand the desire for as much information as possible! When it comes to the non-canon pairings, I do want to know what I'm getting into. But, I feel a little different about canon pairings ... if it's a mention of something that actually exists, but not a focal point of the story, I don't necessarily need a warning for it. If I'm into the canon, I know it exists, so it isn't a surprise. If that makes sense?